HOME POETRY SCREENPLAYS MUSIC MISC
 

I hate spam. Absolutely loathe it. Of spam I am no fan. No fan, I am, of spam. But I shouldn't make a Dr. Seuss poem out of it, because it's really not funny. I get about 300-400 spam e-mails a day.

Therefore I am proposing the following measure that I would like to see all mail administrators and operators of mail servers implement immediately. The way mail servers are currently set up, when a person (or spammer, for whom the title "person" doesn't really fit) sends an e-mail to an e-mail account that doesn't exist, the mail server will bounce the e-mail back to the sender, saying something along the lines of "this e-mail address is invalid." This process can (and is) automated, so that a spammer can automatically track which e-mail addresses on his/her e-mail list are valid and which are invalid, and prune the invalid ones automatically. This is crucial information for the spammer because otherwise he/she would be very inefficient, sending out tons of spam and not knowing even what percentage of that spam is arriving at a valid e-mail address.

Now it's true that individuals who receive spam can block individual spammer e-mail addresses. But this is time consuming, and most people won't take the time to do this, and more importantly, there are too many spammers and the spammers are always changing their "send from" addresses, so this can never be truly effective, and spammers know this. Spammers count on their being xx% of their e-mails being blocked, and I think the actual number is low. It's also true that the spam filters have been getting better, and so they can count on maybe 85-90% of their e-mails going into the "spam" folder of the recipient, which is very different from being outright "blocked" and automatically deleted upon receipt. Why? Because the spam filters are not perfect (that's a very important detail), and so people like myself must manually peruse every message in our "spam" folders to detect the rare (but frequent enough) occurrence of an important message getting marked as spam. To the spammer, this means that people are still reading the "from" and "subject" lines of his/her spam e-mail, and out of all those that read it, a small but important, foolish minority will actually click on the spam, and a still smaller but even more foolish minority will actually act on the spam e-mail and end up putting "clicks" (and money) in the spammer's coffers. Spammers know these ratios and know they can count on getting XX dollars or XX clicks for every 1000-10000 e-mails they send out.

Now here's where it gets fun. The spammer's system only works if they know how many valid e-mails they're reaching. They know how much money they'll make after spamming xxxxx valid e-mail accounts. But what if they didn't know whether or not the e-mail addresses on their list were valid? Then they'd be pretty screwed. Now, I know that what I'm asking is a lot to some people: what I'm asking is that we no longer notify anyone of bounced e-mails. But that's fine. Think about it: If you send an e-mail to somebody, and that e-mail or that somebody is important, then after a few days you'll send another e-mail and eventually either call them or get their new info by doing a search, etc. You can do that because you know the person or company and that particular person or company is very important to you. Spammers, on the other hand, cannot do this. They don't know the people they're spamming, and there are too many addressees for the spammer to personally contact them all. I think that giving up "bounced e-mail notification" is a small price to pay to stop, or put a significant dent in, spammer activity.

How would eliminating bounce notification help the spamming problem? There are several ways:

  1. Spammers wont have the critical information they need. Without knowing whether the e-mails they are spamming are valid or invalid, they don't know what their ROI (return on investment) is. Now granted, their investment is time rather than money, but time is not an infinite quantity, and they don't have time to spam the whole world. It does take time for them to send out a million spams. It's not at all an "instantaneous" process.

  2. We could actively work against the spammers! If spammers don't know which of their e-mail addresses are valid or invalid, we could purposely start posting invalid e-mail addresses on the Web for their Web crawlers to harvest. Today, if we do that, then when they send the spam to the fake address, it bounces and they remove it from their list. But if they didn't get the bounce, then they just wouldn't know. Perhaps we could fill their lists with so much junk that the spamming process would become so inefficient that it just wouldn't be worth their time. Now, only site owners (owners of a Web domain) should make and post the fake e-mails because as an average user of say, Yahoo e-mail, you don't know which names are valid and which aren't. But if you own your own Web site and domain, then you certainly know which e-mail addresses are valid on your domain, and you can easily make up an unlimited number of fake ones and post them.

Well, that's my idea on how to combat spam. Let me know what you think. I hope that those of you who administer e-mail accounts and servers will agree with me and turn off the bounce notification. It's time.

 
 
free web templates
web templates web templates web templates web templates web templates web templates
flash templates flash templates flash templates flash templates flash templates flash templates